Main content

Brought to you by WiredSafety
The world's largest Internet safety, help and education organization
www.wiredsafety.org
E-mail: info@wiredsafety.org

Accessibility

Skip to main content

Support Our Work
Become a volunteer for WiredSafety, the world's largest Internet safety, help and education organization.

WiredSafety is the world's largest online safety and help group

About us :: To volunteer :: Make a donation :: Link to us :: For the media :: Contact us


Report cybercrime here

If the cybercrime you wish to report is NOT listed above, please use our Cyber 911 Tipline. If your case is an emergency, we advise you to contact law enforcement immediately



You are here: Home > Law > Free Speech > CDA, Communications Decency Act

CDA, Communications Decency Act

This is really boring stuff (...but since you asked, your wish is my command.) In February, 1996, as part of a larger bill deregulating the telecommunications industry, Congress enacted the controversial Communications Decency Act of 1996 (usually referred to as the "CDA").

The CDA was an attempt to regulate what was being transmitted over the Internet. In June 1997, the United States Supreme Court ruled that most of the CDA was unconstitutional.

First, a little legal background about free speech in the United States. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives everyone in this country the right to free speech, unrestricted by government interference.

Now, this doesn't mean that government is powerless to act when speech is concerned. For example, governments can set rules about when, where, and how a group can stage a protest march -- and forbid marches to take place at, say, three in the morning with noise levels loud enough to puncture eardrums. These "time, place, and manner" restrictions are fine, as long as they apply to everyone and are reasonable.

But, generally, the government can't set rules about the content of communications --what is being said. Certain exceptions to that rules exist, including one for obscenity. This is called "unprotected speech." If something is obscene, the government can regulate it, and criminalize its use.

The CDA tried to regulate "indecent" material (not "obscene speech"). There's a big difference between "obscenity" and "indecency" legally, although to many of you they may seem the same. (Lawyers never speak the same language as normal people...you should know that by now. If we did, you wouldn't need us, and we'd all have to write books to make a living...) Unfortunately, Congress confused them as well. (Most of them are also lawyers, so what would you expect?) Indecency is protected by the First Amendment, and is most easily described as what makes a movie " PG" rated rather than "G" rated. The CDA, if enforced, could have sent parents to jail just for sending an e-mail to their teenager about responsible birth control.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that speech in cyberspace is entitled to the same protection as the press and books. Basically, if you could write and publish a book or pamphlet on a subject, you can publish it on the Internet. (Note that other countries' laws may conflict with ours, and what may be legal, such as discussions of nazism, in the United States may be illegal elsewhere.)


© Wired Kids, Inc. :: About Us :: Site Map :: Privacy Policy :: Terms :: Bug Report ::
Parts of this Web site were taken from Parry Aftab's book The Parent's Guide to Protecting Your Children in Cyberspace. Marvel and all character names and the distinctive likenesses thereof are trademarks of Marvel Characters, Inc., and are used with permission. TM & © 2004 Marvel Characters, Inc. All rights reserved. www.marvel.com. Super Heroes is a Co-owned registered Trademark.
Back to the top